The Overmanagerial Class

or, How To Eugenically Replicate Gigachadean Agency

3,340 words.

I have failed in my attempt to write a more casual piece, but my intentions were pure of heart. It wasn’t designed to plop an upsetting singularity into the crown of your spine. Year of the Crash Out is reaching its culmination, and we celebrate how everybody else has matched my/our mental instability.

I will open with a controversial take that will surely upset my loyal Nazi fans: I do not think the Hyperborean Overman depicted irregularly in both historical propaganda and current memes represent a realistic genetic pinnacle for White identitarians. The Tall Blonde-Hair Blue-Eyed Aryan does not seem to reflect the genetic characteristics of those individuals who appear to commit to these sociopolitical fights.

I am referring to each quality separately, or the rare aggregate presentation.

You do not need to be a White Nationalist to unpack this claim, my loyal nubian lesbian fans can engage with this like any other article.

When I survey the landscape of notable individuals who have laid down their lives and livelihoods for the mission of European survival – from Germany to England and even America – I don’t see many blonde people. I don’t see many tall people. I’ve seen a great many who do not have blue eyes. The majority of these leaders appear to possess a physiognomy that could be described as “dark” in centuries past. Consider Napoleon. Consider Julius Caesar. They would get zero pussy from Swifties.

Consider the most consequential civilizations and empires in the history of the world – America, Britain, France, Spain, Greece – and their populace are not representative of this physiognomy. In fact the nations that embody this throughout Scandinavia have come to define themselves by passive-aggressive socialism with a penchant for globalist economics rather than the Viking berserkers that outsiders project them being.

As scholars of National Socialist Esoterica we understand why this was done ideologically. I have even known some Dutch who make claims to distant German heredity and dream of a Fourth Reich emerging from windmill country. But we are Doing A Scientific Pragmatism.

This commentary is not implying hidden agendas held by these modern identitarians, quite the contrary: these qualities of self-awareness, leadership, and no small amount of martial prowess are precisely the things a sensible society would like to identify and multiply. But these are not the aesthetic qualities depicted as the visual ideal, the things we are told we ought to multiply. Most importantly, they are not qualities seen as corollaries for exceptionalism.

Where are all the jacked, blonde, A10 supermen? Even Nick Fuentes addressed this on a livestream not long ago, saying that these enviable individuals were off playing video games and smoking weed. Those who seek racial self-determination are for the foreseeable future stuck with him, described in his own words as a short mixed-race incel chud. He is one hundred percent correct, and there is presently scant competition for that level of populist authority.

These racial aristocrats seem numerously absent, yet their images emblazon inspirational posters. From a genetic perspective, we are always seeking to identify which traits should be propagated for the purposes of survival. Certain qualities appear to be more positively correlated to the aggressiveness of persistence, but they are not portrayed as aspirational. There appears to be a disconnect between our dreams and our fantasies.

Some will claim that the imagery is simply aspirational, or that its only intention is to be anti-ugly. A visual rallying call towards the singular power of the Western essence and something to spiritually strive towards. Viscerally imagined cries of “you’re overthinking it” cascade down upon me. But then we wouldn’t have an article. We must have an article. I already did the images.

With all those caveats addressed, the purpose of this inquiry is to dissect why something is aspirational, and when it stands as a biological ideal whether it necessarily intersects with the eugenic. There seems to be a disconnect between the qualities that optimize genetic survival and the qualities desired in mates. To take it further, do our aspirations subtly promote dysgenic qualities?

If short guys with dark hair are more often the great who make history, why are the hoes so scared? Why aren’t the physical attributes of billionaire nerds who hunt humans for sport and will in all likelihood crack the code of eternal life seen as attractive?

Something has chased Mark Zuckerberg into appropriating Kung Fu Wigger culture.

I asked this once to a Far-Right Feminist who, like many others, have found popularity in inversely mirroring the bombast of the masculine “redpill” sphere. There, all the anti-feminist talking points are embraced, one such accusation being female hypergamy.

Women, we are told by some of our wealthiest content creators, are naturally drawn to the Alpha Male of their tribe or society and any females will find it preferable to mate with the same high value male. Women date up and across their social status, but never down, which makes competition for the high value males exceptionally chaotic. Visualized data will be presented explaining that throughout history it was likely that upwards of twice as many women would bear a child but only 30-60% of men will father a child, indicating a trend towards polygamy, harems, or perhaps adultery. It is difficult to argue with the data, and even the fact that more men died young across time and were sacrificed at the altar of war does not dismiss the consequence of mate selection.

Where once this was dismissed as a misogynistic trope, the feminists in question assert it’s not only accurate but a laudable function of civilizational survival. To them, women are the stewards of the genome and should exercise extreme biases towards mate selection. Men just need to do better to fulfill their standards, and there is nothing more dignified than a chubby bully on SSRIs believing she deserves a handsome vampire billionaire.

If this duty were truly held, why would so many women favor self-destructive or even sociopathic behavioral tendencies in their mates? Have you ever known a girlboss who dates a reprehensible loser? How about the middling executive who believe they deserve the top 0.01% of men and bide their time until their organs expire? The intention here is not to paint with too broad a brush, but it seems that this theory grants unrealistic agency to a side that has shown to be extremely poor at the purported eugenics project. They’re just not good at it.

Furthermore, have you noticed that the majority of CEOs and executives appear to date laterally, often within their own social circles? It does not appear to bear out that women from the lower rungs of social class are reproducing with the top. This was presented by Christopher Lasch in Revolt of the Elites, arguing that this reinforced class segregation. If you exist in the real world and observe real people, you notice that George Clooney does not in fact have relationships with bitter graphic design girls or OnlyFans witches.

Then one day they wake up and it’s too late to snag a dawg.

If we examine the competitive landscape of the 21^st century, it’s clear that the most successful, powerful, and materially rewarding men tend to be nerdy technocrats. They’re probably short, they’re probably succumbing to the Norwood Reaper and despite that allegedly being an indicator of high testosterone that is treated as genetically inferior. High-value women may of course eventually settle for these paragons of their era, but it is never seen as genetically superior at the outset. They are not necessarily attracted to the qualities that charted the course to this social status. They choose these men not particularly because they want to codify these characteristics in their race, it’s more that they can guarantee limitless trips to Ibiza. They will admit the cynical nature of these pairings quite openly.

How many women would claw their way to sleeping with Napoleon vs. a broke criminal than smells of cat piss and cigarettes like this author? I am 6 feet tall with blue eyes and a devilish head of hair so I am arguing against my own interests with this entire article. I gain nothing from this.

Not only is the aesthetic peak of European existence absent during its public war for genetic survival, but one wonders how inspirational it is to strive towards for the average person. You, an oppressed Ham and Egger, does the revolt against ugliness agitate you to action? Does this cargo cult to hairless chests inspire you?

The man it depicts would never seek confidence from propaganda. He certainly would not let the works of intellectuals guide his ambitions.

The conceptual hyperborean man is not a populist. It is unrealistic to expect the layperson to become a lone wolf paragon. The great irony of Western dissidence is that its proponents yearn for collectivist power but idolize aristocratic – even gloriously rugged – individualism. McLuhan sketched out the trauma associated with the Western individualist being thrust back into the “global village” of ancient egalitarian communitarianism by way of technological immersion. We are currently struggling through this transition; our psyches ripped in twain between our disdain towards emotional mass revolt and the romanticism of being able to strike at oppressors with furious melanated immediacy.

The Hyperborean Man cannot be a sweeping collectivist. Third World Revolutions are a type of software we cannot run, driven as they are by surrendering primary to the dark music of genetic savagery. In late 2025 the Nepalese youth burned down their parliament and attacked every Prime Minister past and present they could get their hands on, all because the state took Facebook away. It is why White people were flummoxed by the George Floyd Riots: it made perfect sense to the perpetrators because Black Americans see their oppressor as the entire White (Supremacist) system, represented even by their neighborhoods which they merely temporarily inhabited.

Whether a blessing or a curse, Rationality will not permit Europeans to behave as a mindless cleansing fire. This is both cultural and biochemical.

There are two fundamentally opposed modes of experience and their difference is rooted in the bihemispheric structure of the brain. The brain’s left and right hemispheres need to co-operate, but Iain McGilchrist puts forth the theory that they are involved in a sort of power struggle, and that this explains many aspects of contemporary Western culture.

We are not describing different ways of thinking about the world, rather wildly different ways of being in the world. The right hemisphere, with its greater integrative power, is constantly searching for patterns in things. The left hemisphere operates an abstract visual-form system, storing information that remains relatively invariant across specific instances, producing less malleable categories of things. One is better at long-term thinking and creating complex mental constructs, while the other is designed for processing a wealth immediate information for short-term goals. Knowledge lines – or K-Lines – crisscross each side, creating a complex web of triggers and reactions that bind new information with experience. How these connections carve their way into existence is the purview of neurobiology.

“The history of the West shows times when a move forward in one hemisphere ‘releases’ a move forward in the other, according to Nietzsche’s assertion that ‘these two very different drives [the Apollonian and Dionysian] exist side by side, mostly in open conflict, stimulating and provoking one another to give birth to ever-new, more vigorous offspring, in whom they perpetuate the conflict inherent in the opposition between them.” – Iain McGilchrist, The Master and His Emissary

The theory dictates that Western civilization has reached a point where the balance has swung irretrievably far towards the Apollonian left hemisphere, which now appears to believe that it can do anything, or make anything, on its own. This is the side of rationality, primed to comprehend the universe through scientific dissection and recreation. The reaction we see both politically and technologically is a romanticism towards the world of the ancients, cyclical time, and perhaps a more profound romanticism towards the world around us. To be at one with nature rather than the Faustian quest towards rebuilding the universe in our image.

Whether or not you believe this cognitive shift has truly occurred, the foundation is the focus of this discussion: the Western mind was notable for its ability to apprehend larger ideas in an abstracted mental space and create more intricate ideological constructs with which to comprehend the hidden dimensions of the universe. Many of my cohorts envision an acceleration in this direction, to mount a revolt against the modern world that cuts through the cacophony of information dragging us towards the bosom of feminine reactivity. There is a strong case to be made for either, but the left hemisphere is responsible for both empathy and the capacity to create complex mental architecture defining long term strategies. These are the capabilities we often cite to test for a higher-order mind. A mind of existential literacy. A mind of agency.

A question was therefore posed by one of my community members: how can we as a society behaviorally filter for agency? Taken further, can we eugenically identify those who possess these qualities? In other words, to multiply the overman. There are mental faculties that have become memes in recent years that indicate the dimensionality of the ask: picture an object in your head and rotate it. Tell me how you would feel if you did not have breakfast this morning. Tell me what your inner voice sounds like.

I do not believe these capabilities are necessarily correlated with IQ, and I have encountered several high-IQ individuals who cannot action one or all of the aforementioned abilities. I have seen some very learned men who are deeply impressed with the free LLM they are convinced is the most ingenious mind, this is the sort of thing I am talking about. It is not stupid people vs. smart people. Maybe it’s the souled vs. the soulless. That sounds extreme. Let’s leave it there anyway.

Returning to the beginning of this inquiry, the selecting for what one could term Elite Martial Traits: how do we eugenically promote Left-Hemisphere thinking, and proliferate the very individuality the Right alternatively condemns and lionizes?

The best answers I can muster relate to the capacity for responsible leadership and the curiosity to seek out challenging information. A leader who can stand apart from those under his charge but also maintain the same people for an extended period of time is extremely rare, and there are countless examples of tyrannical leadership both in professional and political instances. Foresight, empathy, organizational acumen, and the capacity to understand the group organism indicate a higher order mental state. Overlapping with this is the desire to seek out information that challenges one’s preconceived notions, never retreating to the comfort of biases as this man understands the fluidity of survival. This is Anti-Fandom behavior.

Why do we need to scientifically multiply these people? Perhaps only 15% of a population sit at the intersection of these qualities. And perhaps that is how it should be; these individuals are summoned by their historical period, and the filter is their abilities manifesting. If they are inferior stock, they end up exiled or consumed by their own groups. We don’t need gene editing for this, we just need more severe mechanisms to filter out the pretenders, the grifters, the sociopaths.

The Aristocrat of the Sovl does not require a guide to accomplish any of this. He does not need to read a book to awaken these qualities within him. He is not looking for an intellectual leader.

On the contrary, those who promote the technic of elite masculinity are in all likelihood coercing the wrong sorts of people, those who do not genuinely feel these compulsions and therefore create a shoddy fandom of strength. Some say the sovereign is identified as he who decides the exception, and true power does not proclaim itself. Similarly, the hyperborean man does not traffic in memes of himself. He just does things.

Is there a way to effectively communicate to this nascent population? In an era of mass communication, the established forms seem counterintuitive. I am not a staunch believer in “antimemetics,” especially considering I find the term misleading. But within the sometimes-confused expression of the theory rests the truth that certain influential ideas are not designed to be populist in deployment. A meme as originally described by Richard Dawkins can be summarized as units of cultural transmission (not just an idea, but an idea expressed through communication) that move, replicate, and evolve like organisms. Its strength is dictated by how many minds it can thrive in and how long its fundamental message can persist in the zeitgeist, even after countless iterations of retranslation.

“The memetic city is easily recognizable. It is the realm of viral ideas and social contagion: tweets that explode overnight, social media avatars supporting the latest political cause, TikToks and Instagram Reels that we scroll through at the end of a long day. […] But the strength and might of the memetic city depends partly upon another, less visible, but equally powerful world that we don’t always notice or see: the antimemetic city. The antimemetic city resists replication, dwelling in the shadows of our collective consciousness. Like Shenzhen, which drives the global electronics market, or Zürich, which drives global finance, the antimemetic city is not invisible for lack of importance, but because it thrives on operating quietly in the background.” – Nadia Asparouhova, “Antimemetics: Why Some Ideas Resist Spreading”

The notion that certain ideas should present themselves as hostile to most viewers is a novel one in a maddening information age. Ideas that glimmer with a toxic coating so only the initiated can consume them, that prevent them from the mistranslation that occurs with widespread acceptance. The problem is that this appears to lead to severe mistranslation in the short term, even the target audience unsure if a message is serious or a troll deployed as an purity test. Messages that inspire fevered debate even among the initiated, meaning that while most will recoil at the sight, the immune can still interpret them however they want.

In this sense antimemes proliferate not as encrypted wisdom but concepts that immediately mutilate themselves. An valiant attempt at aristocratic coding that bears all the markings of a deranged fandom.

Standing apart in singular greatness is not a meme to be trafficked for popular consumption. There are those who want to bring you onto a content plantation concerning the relationship between people (you) and power (not you.) Still more rubes want you to adopt a theory speculating on the innerworkings of power as a class. All of these are shoddy altars constructed by the egotistical fringe – delirious exiled strivers – upon which to sacrifice the consumer of ideas in a vain attempt to impress the influential.

The popularity of the propaganda of the hyperborean man attacks its legitimacy. Leaders are selling leaderlessness, cargo cults of distant elites are forming, at every level it’s the familiar phenomenon of rich men selling courses on how to become rich, the secret being that one must sell courses to convince desperate simpletons on how to be rich. The Overmanagerial Class shucking pyramid schemes in futile efforts to barter their way into an elite class they barely understand. Women cannot be the shepherds of the genetic code because they struggle to identify eugenic qualities aside from aesthetics and the data concerning hypergamy misleads one to believe they even desire to engage in this process. The memes we share promoting greatness do not reflect the great men who alter the trajectory of history. Those who are called upon by destiny to fulfill these actions already posses this awareness, and they’re not slave to any filter.

So that is all to say that women should be fucking more short guys.