Having kids when you are in a weak financial situation destines them for a life in the lower classes. Men's efforts should be spent achieving success, power, and accomplishments when they're young so their offspring have a fighting chance in this world.
I know a bunch of people who spent their 20s and 30s building savings and careers, only to run out of time to find a partner and have the family they wanted. They’re lucky to have 1 or 2 kids, most have none. Children can be raised on a budget. Your comment seems to imply that having children when you’re down financially kind of “locks” you and your family in at that economic level (sounds like you’re saying they’re a huge financial drag). This is categorically not true.
To put it another way, you need people who truly believe reproduction has a spiritual or ontological essentiality to their identity, not just an unintended consequence of seeking pleasure.
It's purple-pilled nonsense.
He makes oppressing women into some grand spiritual endeavour vs just slappin a bitch.
We've got a bit of a 'Fallout' situation developing in London, what with all the different categories of mutants shambling around. I was at an outdoor gym in the summer and there was a chronically obese Pakistani just screaming into the air. My friend's got one that lives next door - really livens up a relaxing Sunday BBQ. And then there's the shanty market near where I work that sells individual shoes. Whether or not this is related to all the club feet, I don't know. What I'm trying to say is: I'm almost at the point where I'm enjoying it.
You say "the proclivity to destroy criminality is Christian" and follow it up with Foucault being a pedophile, which seems to indicate you would permit it.
The church also curtailed parents’ abilities to retain kinship ties through arranged marriages by prohibiting unions in which the bride didn’t explicitly agree to the union.
You accepted n1gger dick when you accepted christ.
Okay cool so you are permissive of pedophilia, good to know. You are doing a great job winning people over to whatever weird pagan fandom you're selling.
Re: fertility data, where do you see White fertility in the US above Black and Asian, but far below Hispanic? The data I know of shows it towards the bottom of the list.
Re: higher fertility among higher incomes, this may just be a reversion to the norm for most of human history.
Finally, Hispanic fertility is relatively high but there is a significant percentage of White-Hispanic intermarriage. The majority of the products of these unions look and identify as White, speaking English as mother tongue and little Spanish, if any. There is a significant Hispanic to White demographic pump where Hispanic women are birthing White babies but it’s counted towards Hispanic fertility statistics because we look at the ethnicity of the mother, not the baby itself. Factoring that in, Whites are probably siphoning off a good 0.3-0.4 births per Hispanic woman into their own demographic bucket.
'This is the true meaning of ethnogenesis: the singularity of a new founding stock from which a revitalized people can grow. But you can't save many, even most, who are determined to self destruct.'
The implication is that such an outcome is inevitable. Which seems to me unworthy of a 'ethny' that postures as 'aristocratic'.
This is why I don't see how anyone can talk about 'eugenics' in any serious way from a position of weakness within the socio-political-economic order. There's just a lack of perspective that results in the more egregious forms of utopian fantasy.
In the long run, biology rules. But in the short and medium term, it's the *ideology* that has the most effect on how biology expresses itself.
I really doesn't matter if the upper classes are having more children if (a) those children don't have children (because of ideology) or if (b) those children race-mix away their genetic endowments.
It's *race-mixing* not 'dysgenics' that is producing the corrosion of everything that Whites used to value and accepted as 'the case'.
Because in the context of the piece - being sold "serfdom as aristocracy" - what I am addressing is both the lie and the subservient position being laundered in.
Caricatures are amusing the first time around, but people grow 'wise to them' pretty quickly. 😉
The Truth is that the 'cousin marriage -- YUCK!' sensationalism no longer works. 😉
Yes, you can get a bit of a 'draw' for it in some circles, but it will always remain a niche thing:
People who have Muslim neighbours (the proper, practising sort) know what sort of people they are dealing with (firm demeanour, values, etc) & are not swayed by (shall we say)... the Orientalist claptrap. This is why the Most effective form of Daw'ah (i.e. prosletyzation) is actually just Basic Dealings in Business, Community interaction, etc. & not anything 'in your face.' That's actually one of the main reasons (for instance) the British brothers are so successful. They simply 'live their lives' in Piety & others wish to Emulate them... Mimesis works wonders! 😉
That said, I don't mind Yourself ( & others! ) continue using said talking point, since it makes our position stronger (in an indirect sort of way):
The negative publicity it generates in the few people who still believe in it, makes us stand out more & when we do come forward en masse, we can simply push our views, stances, etc in a more unified fashion. So essentially, it is an indirect call for Muslim Unity! 😉
By all means! Carry on with the 'YUCK!' argumentum & we will continue building Eurabia, One White Revert/ Convert & one more Muslim family at a time! 😉
Addendum: Here's the Spengler quote from about 100 years ago that is relevant for this particular piece, considering its emphasis on extoling 'Eugenics' & related 'efficiencies' in Man 😉 :
>> And then, when being is sufficiently uprooted and waking-being sufficiently strained, there suddenly emerges into the bright light of history a phenomenon that has long been preparing itself underground and now steps forward to make an end of the drama—the sterility of civilized man. This is not something that can be grasped as a plain matter of causality (as modern science naturally enough has tried to grasp it); it is to be understood as an essentially metaphysical turn towards death. The last man of the world-city no longer wants to live—he may cling to life as an individual, but as a type, as an aggregate, no, for it is a characteristic of this collective existence that it eliminates the terror of death. That which strikes the true peasant with a deep and inexplicable fear, the notion that the family and the name may be extinguished, has now lost its meaning. The continuance of the blood-relation in the visible world is no longer a duty of the blood, and the destiny of being the last of the line is no longer felt as a doom. Children do not happen, not because children have become impossible, but principally because intelligence at the peak of intensity can no longer find any reason for their existence. <<
The Decline Of The West, Vol. II, Alfred A. Knopf, 1928, pp. 103–04
It is an unserious talking point & a caricature, correct.
Well, some Muslims (like the Eminent Shaykh Abdal Hakim Murad) are like that. The majority (including myself) have a lot more work to do when it comes to matters of Etiquette. That said, Mimesis is the way to go for the Eurabian Caliphate
Negative Attention is very helpful, especially these recent British riots... which saw an uptick in conversions in the Cambridge Central Mosque & other Masajid across the UK.
Eurabia will comprise tens of millions of White Englishmen Converts/Reverts.
Some of them will Destroy large chunks of their own societies (i.e. Convenience stores, Communiy Centres, etc) before coming over to the Winning Team...
Well then you’d better get on it because at the pace these conversions are happening it’s gonna take you folk like a couple of millennia to make any meaningful progress.
Please stop writing like a woman if you want to argue at the big kids table.
As for islam, jury is still out if it can handle the degenerating effects of liberalism. The reconquestia of afghanistan is promising but we shall see if it sticks for any length of time.
Just a simple look at TFR shows some worrying trends. Iran at 1.7, tunisia at 1.8, saudi arabia at 2.4 and dropping, qatar at 1.8, the UAE at 1.46.
You started the race to hell later than the west but the floor will come up regardless if you don’t stop.
I can see why you’d want to steer clear of eugenics, we might actually be able to fix that massive inbreeding problem your people have if we could honestly discuss it, and we can’t have that.
Having kids when you are in a weak financial situation destines them for a life in the lower classes. Men's efforts should be spent achieving success, power, and accomplishments when they're young so their offspring have a fighting chance in this world.
I know a bunch of people who spent their 20s and 30s building savings and careers, only to run out of time to find a partner and have the family they wanted. They’re lucky to have 1 or 2 kids, most have none. Children can be raised on a budget. Your comment seems to imply that having children when you’re down financially kind of “locks” you and your family in at that economic level (sounds like you’re saying they’re a huge financial drag). This is categorically not true.
Phenomenal piece.
To put it another way, you need people who truly believe reproduction has a spiritual or ontological essentiality to their identity, not just an unintended consequence of seeking pleasure.
It's purple-pilled nonsense.
He makes oppressing women into some grand spiritual endeavour vs just slappin a bitch.
https://blog.reaction.la/culture/emancipation-of-women-was-a-fitness-test-that-we-failed/
We've got a bit of a 'Fallout' situation developing in London, what with all the different categories of mutants shambling around. I was at an outdoor gym in the summer and there was a chronically obese Pakistani just screaming into the air. My friend's got one that lives next door - really livens up a relaxing Sunday BBQ. And then there's the shanty market near where I work that sells individual shoes. Whether or not this is related to all the club feet, I don't know. What I'm trying to say is: I'm almost at the point where I'm enjoying it.
banger.
The proclivity to destroy criminality is Christian.
Foucault was a child molestor.
All you've given is a random spiel trying to re-configure christcuckery.
Go back to your ancestral customs & re-instate patriarchy.
Your birthrate will be fine.
Most brown, yellows etc are just various editions of Prog
You say "the proclivity to destroy criminality is Christian" and follow it up with Foucault being a pedophile, which seems to indicate you would permit it.
I'll permit it if it's limited to Christian boys.
Get serious and stop trolling just because I insulted your kike cult.
You should be used to this by now.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25748943/
https://www.unz.com/pfrost/western-europe-state-formation-and-genetic-pacification-3/
https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/whatever-happened-to-european-tribes/
The church also curtailed parents’ abilities to retain kinship ties through arranged marriages by prohibiting unions in which the bride didn’t explicitly agree to the union.
You accepted n1gger dick when you accepted christ.
Okay cool so you are permissive of pedophilia, good to know. You are doing a great job winning people over to whatever weird pagan fandom you're selling.
🥱🥱
Every man is a pedophile today by feminist definitions.
Go learn about christian reaction if you're going to at least attempt the religion.
https://blog.reaction.la/culture/emancipation-of-women-was-a-fitness-test-that-we-failed/
https://blog.reaction.la/culture/how-to-restore-a-reproductively-successful-society/
https://blog.reaction.la/economics/the-future-belongs-to-those-that-show-up/
ਅਕਾਲ
"Every man is a pedophile, christcuck."
Eh, go worship your based redeemed virgin with niglets in tow.
🤷🏽♂️⚔️
Re: fertility data, where do you see White fertility in the US above Black and Asian, but far below Hispanic? The data I know of shows it towards the bottom of the list.
Re: higher fertility among higher incomes, this may just be a reversion to the norm for most of human history.
Finally, Hispanic fertility is relatively high but there is a significant percentage of White-Hispanic intermarriage. The majority of the products of these unions look and identify as White, speaking English as mother tongue and little Spanish, if any. There is a significant Hispanic to White demographic pump where Hispanic women are birthing White babies but it’s counted towards Hispanic fertility statistics because we look at the ethnicity of the mother, not the baby itself. Factoring that in, Whites are probably siphoning off a good 0.3-0.4 births per Hispanic woman into their own demographic bucket.
'This is the true meaning of ethnogenesis: the singularity of a new founding stock from which a revitalized people can grow. But you can't save many, even most, who are determined to self destruct.'
The implication is that such an outcome is inevitable. Which seems to me unworthy of a 'ethny' that postures as 'aristocratic'.
This is why I don't see how anyone can talk about 'eugenics' in any serious way from a position of weakness within the socio-political-economic order. There's just a lack of perspective that results in the more egregious forms of utopian fantasy.
In the long run, biology rules. But in the short and medium term, it's the *ideology* that has the most effect on how biology expresses itself.
I really doesn't matter if the upper classes are having more children if (a) those children don't have children (because of ideology) or if (b) those children race-mix away their genetic endowments.
It's *race-mixing* not 'dysgenics' that is producing the corrosion of everything that Whites used to value and accepted as 'the case'.
Why is serfdom a dirty word to you?
Because in the context of the piece - being sold "serfdom as aristocracy" - what I am addressing is both the lie and the subservient position being laundered in.
The subservient position is much worse than being a serf, though.
Caricatures are amusing the first time around, but people grow 'wise to them' pretty quickly. 😉
The Truth is that the 'cousin marriage -- YUCK!' sensationalism no longer works. 😉
Yes, you can get a bit of a 'draw' for it in some circles, but it will always remain a niche thing:
People who have Muslim neighbours (the proper, practising sort) know what sort of people they are dealing with (firm demeanour, values, etc) & are not swayed by (shall we say)... the Orientalist claptrap. This is why the Most effective form of Daw'ah (i.e. prosletyzation) is actually just Basic Dealings in Business, Community interaction, etc. & not anything 'in your face.' That's actually one of the main reasons (for instance) the British brothers are so successful. They simply 'live their lives' in Piety & others wish to Emulate them... Mimesis works wonders! 😉
That said, I don't mind Yourself ( & others! ) continue using said talking point, since it makes our position stronger (in an indirect sort of way):
The negative publicity it generates in the few people who still believe in it, makes us stand out more & when we do come forward en masse, we can simply push our views, stances, etc in a more unified fashion. So essentially, it is an indirect call for Muslim Unity! 😉
By all means! Carry on with the 'YUCK!' argumentum & we will continue building Eurabia, One White Revert/ Convert & one more Muslim family at a time! 😉
Addendum: Here's the Spengler quote from about 100 years ago that is relevant for this particular piece, considering its emphasis on extoling 'Eugenics' & related 'efficiencies' in Man 😉 :
>> And then, when being is sufficiently uprooted and waking-being sufficiently strained, there suddenly emerges into the bright light of history a phenomenon that has long been preparing itself underground and now steps forward to make an end of the drama—the sterility of civilized man. This is not something that can be grasped as a plain matter of causality (as modern science naturally enough has tried to grasp it); it is to be understood as an essentially metaphysical turn towards death. The last man of the world-city no longer wants to live—he may cling to life as an individual, but as a type, as an aggregate, no, for it is a characteristic of this collective existence that it eliminates the terror of death. That which strikes the true peasant with a deep and inexplicable fear, the notion that the family and the name may be extinguished, has now lost its meaning. The continuance of the blood-relation in the visible world is no longer a duty of the blood, and the destiny of being the last of the line is no longer felt as a doom. Children do not happen, not because children have become impossible, but principally because intelligence at the peak of intensity can no longer find any reason for their existence. <<
The Decline Of The West, Vol. II, Alfred A. Knopf, 1928, pp. 103–04
So for anyone who wants a tl;dr of that:
- Being against cousin marriage and inbreeding is sensationalist.
- People want to become Muslims simply by standing beside them.
- All forms of negative attention actually help Muslims (so keep it up!)
- 😉
It is an unserious talking point & a caricature, correct.
Well, some Muslims (like the Eminent Shaykh Abdal Hakim Murad) are like that. The majority (including myself) have a lot more work to do when it comes to matters of Etiquette. That said, Mimesis is the way to go for the Eurabian Caliphate
Negative Attention is very helpful, especially these recent British riots... which saw an uptick in conversions in the Cambridge Central Mosque & other Masajid across the UK.
😉
We are both on the side of more White Englishmen rioting against Muslims and organizing demonstrations against them as frequently as possible.
Eurabia will comprise tens of millions of White Englishmen Converts/Reverts.
Some of them will Destroy large chunks of their own societies (i.e. Convenience stores, Communiy Centres, etc) before coming over to the Winning Team...
Others will figure it out earlier.
That's basically all there is to it 😉
Well then you’d better get on it because at the pace these conversions are happening it’s gonna take you folk like a couple of millennia to make any meaningful progress.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0dRnDcamcQ&t=173s
Baby steps... 😉
Inshallah, we will have Good News to share by mid century! 😊
Please stop writing like a woman if you want to argue at the big kids table.
As for islam, jury is still out if it can handle the degenerating effects of liberalism. The reconquestia of afghanistan is promising but we shall see if it sticks for any length of time.
Just a simple look at TFR shows some worrying trends. Iran at 1.7, tunisia at 1.8, saudi arabia at 2.4 and dropping, qatar at 1.8, the UAE at 1.46.
You started the race to hell later than the west but the floor will come up regardless if you don’t stop.
Stop writing like an illiterate retard.
‘Eugenics’ does not belong at the Adult table 😉
I agree btw that it is a normal fixture of the kids table (not really sure what a ‘big kids’ table is, since kids are by definition tiny 😉)
I can see why you’d want to steer clear of eugenics, we might actually be able to fix that massive inbreeding problem your people have if we could honestly discuss it, and we can’t have that.
‘Inbreeding’
» From a society which has abandoned the elderly in prisons (so-called ‘old homes’), has no children & cannot control their women.
Ya, Not a serious point considering the ‘mouth’ in question speaking it 😉
What say you, Sirs @H1B Pajeet, @Kenaz Filan @Phisto Sobanii & @Texas Arcane ? 😉
Notice that he didn't deny the inbreeding. This is why I specifically mentioned it in the piece, you stay on him long enough and he'll endorse it.
It’s not a serious talking point.
Caricatures are not responded to 😉
🥱
Reporting for duty